National Elevator Industry Hea v. Bernard McLaughlin
NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES |
BERNARD MCLAUGHLIN |
16-1352 |
February 24, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Employee Retirement |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
National Elevator Industry Hea v. Bernard McLaughlin |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012505333 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE*, HARDIMAN and RENDELL, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. Judge: RENDELL Authoring. *Judge McKee was Chief Judge at the time this appeal was submitted. Judge McKee completed his term as Chief Judge on September 30, 2016. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: National Elevator Industry Hea v. Bernard McLaughlin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: NATIONAL ELEVATOR INDUSTRY HEALTH BENEFIT PLAN BOARD OF TRUSTEES | |
Represented By: | Rachael E. Banks |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: BERNARD MCLAUGHLIN | |
Represented By: | Steven L. Kessel |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.