Joseph Egan v. Delaware River Port Authority
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOSEPH EGAN
Defendant - Appellee: DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY
Case Number: 16-1471
Filed: March 18, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 21, 2017 Summary Egan v. Delaware River Port Authority

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012568476 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, JORDAN and SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 39. Judge: SHWARTZ Authoring, Judge: JORDAN Concurring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Egan v. Delaware River Port Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JOSEPH EGAN
Represented By: Scott B. Goldshaw
Represented By: Michael J. Salmanson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY
Represented By: Zachary R. Davis
Represented By: Danielle M. Dwyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?