Albert Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond PC
ALBERT DAVIS |
PHELAN HALLINAN & DIAMOND PC |
16-1952 |
April 19, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Consumer Credit |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Albert Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond PC |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012601649 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, JORDAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 10. Judge: JORDAN Authoring. (*The incorrect addresses for counsel were listed on the initial transmission of the opinion. The addresses have been corrected, and notice is being resent.)--[Edited 04/24/2017 by CJG] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Albert Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond PC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: ALBERT DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Adam Deutsch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: PHELAN HALLINAN & DIAMOND PC | |
Represented By: | Kenneth S. Goodkind |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.