Albert Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond PC
Plaintiff - Appellant: ALBERT DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee: PHELAN HALLINAN & DIAMOND PC
Case Number: 16-1952
Filed: April 19, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 24, 2017 Albert Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond PC

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 24, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012601649 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, JORDAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 10. Judge: JORDAN Authoring. (*The incorrect addresses for counsel were listed on the initial transmission of the opinion. The addresses have been corrected, and notice is being resent.)--[Edited 04/24/2017 by CJG]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Albert Davis v. Phelan Hallinan & Diamond PC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ALBERT DAVIS
Represented By: Adam Deutsch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PHELAN HALLINAN & DIAMOND PC
Represented By: Kenneth S. Goodkind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?