Jean Coulter v. James Coulter
Plaintiff - Appellant: JEAN COULTER
Defendant - Appellee: JAMES P. COULTER
Case Number: 16-3053
Filed: July 6, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Property Damage

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 2, 2017 Jean Coulter v. James Coulter

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012768476 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, COWEN and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. Appellant's motion to supplement the appendix with documents that Appellant says are relevant to the issue of recusal is granted.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jean Coulter v. James Coulter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JEAN COULTER
Represented By: Jean Coulter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: JAMES P. COULTER
Represented By: Ronald T. Elliott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?