Thomas Rink v. Northeastern Educational, et al
| THOMAS RINK |
| NORTHEASTERN EDUCATION INTERMEDIATE UNIT NO 19 |
| 16-3183 |
| July 22, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Thomas Rink v. Northeastern Educational |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012803678
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: GREENAWAY JR., SHWARTZ, Circuit Judges and SIMANDLE*,Senior District Judge*. Total Pages: 30. Judge: SIMANDLE Authoring.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Rink v. Northeastern Educational, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: THOMAS RINK | |
| Represented By: | Brett A. Datto |
| Represented By: | Lauren N. Schwimmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: NORTHEASTERN EDUCATION INTERMEDIATE UNIT NO 19 | |
| Represented By: | William J. McPartland |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
