USA v. Jose Rodriguez
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ |
16-3232 |
July 29, 2016 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
United States v. Rodriguez |
USA v. Jose Rodriguez |
USA v. Jose Rodriguez |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012609682 ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Clerk) to remove the incorrect footnote indicating that Judge Restrepo participated by video conference. |
Filing 3012607534 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: CHAGARES, RESTREPO* and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 14. Judge: RESTREPO Authoring. *Participated via video conference.--[Edited 04/28/2017 by JK] |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Jose Rodriguez | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Scott R. Ford |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellant: JOSE ANGEL RODRIGUEZ | |
Represented By: | Federal Public Defender Middle District of Pennsylvania |
Represented By: | Ronald A. Krauss |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.