James Joyce v. Maersk Line Inc
Plaintiff - Appellant: JAMES L. JOYCE
Defendant - Appellee: MAERSK LINE INC
Case Number: 16-3553
Filed: September 7, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Marine Contract Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 4, 2017 Summary Joyce v. Maersk Line Ltd

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 4, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012793002 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, Chief Judge, MCKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 21. Judge: JORDAN Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Joyce v. Maersk Line Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMES L. JOYCE
Represented By: Patrick F. Flanigan
Represented By: Dennis M. O'Bryan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: MAERSK LINE INC
Represented By: John J. Walsh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?