Andrew Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANDREW PANICO
Defendant - Appellee: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Case Number: 16-3852
Filed: October 21, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
January 2, 2018 Summary Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 2, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3012814531 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: VANASKIE, KRAUSE and RESTREPO, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 11. Judge: RESTREPO Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Andrew Panico v. Portfolio Recovery Associates
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ANDREW PANICO
Represented By: Philip D. Stern
Represented By: Andrew T. Thomasson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES LLC
Represented By: David N. Anthony
Represented By: Amanda L. Genovese
Represented By: Cindy D. Hanson
Represented By: Stephen C. Piepgrass
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?