Robert Benhenni v. Bayesian Efficient Strategic
| ROBERT BENHENNI |
| BAYESIAN EFFICIENT STRATEGIC TRADING LLC |
| 16-3949 |
| October 27, 2016 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Arbitration |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Robert Benhenni v. Bayesian Efficient Strategic |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012642139
NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: RESTREPO, SCIRICA and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 7. Appellee's motion for leave to file a supplemental appendix (Appendix, Volume I) is granted. To the extent Appellee seeks to expand the record (Appendix, Volume II), the motion is denied.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Robert Benhenni v. Bayesian Efficient Strategic | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ROBERT BENHENNI | |
| Represented By: | David M. Rosoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: BAYESIAN EFFICIENT STRATEGIC TRADING LLC | |
| Represented By: | Robert M. Pettigrew |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
