Linda Lackey v. Heart of Lancaster Regional Me
Plaintiff - Appellant: LINDA LACKEY
Defendant - Appellee: HEART OF LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Case Number: 16-3986
Filed: October 28, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 27, 2017 Linda Lackey v. Heart of Lancaster Regional Me

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 27, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012685042 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: JORDAN, KRAUSE and GREENBERG, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 17. Judge: GREENBERG Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Linda Lackey v. Heart of Lancaster Regional Me
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: LINDA LACKEY
Represented By: Wayne A. Ely
Represented By: W. Charles Sipio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: HEART OF LANCASTER REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Represented By: Kate A. Kleba
Represented By: Sidney R. Steinberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?