Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns Co Inc
Plaintiff - Appellee: READING HEALTH SYSTEM
Defendant - Appellant: BEAR STEARNS CO INC
Case Number: 16-4234
Filed: December 2, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 7, 2018 Summary Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns & Co., Inc.

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3013002542 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, ROTH and PAPPERT, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 36. Judge: ROTH Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Reading Health System v. Bear Stearns Co Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: READING HEALTH SYSTEM
Represented By: Randall K. Berger
Represented By: Thomas W. Elrod
Represented By: Peter S. Linden
Represented By: Lauren Wagner Pederson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: BEAR STEARNS CO INC
Represented By: Michael K. Coran
Represented By: Teri M. Sherman
Represented By: Jonathan K. Youngwood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?