Joan Summy-Long v. Penn State University, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOAN Y. SUMMY-LONG
Defendant - Appellee: PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
Case Number: 17-1206
Filed: January 26, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 6, 2017 Joan Summy-Long v. Penn State University

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012771110 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, KRAUSE, Circuit Judges and *CONTI, District Judge. Total Pages: 9. Judge: AMBRO Authoring. *Honorable Chief Judge Joy Flowers Conti, District Judge for the Western District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joan Summy-Long v. Penn State University, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: JOAN Y. SUMMY-LONG
Represented By: John M. Kerr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: PENN STATE UNIVERSITY
Represented By: Janine C. Gismondi
Represented By: Chena L. Glenn-Hart
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?