Jamie Elliott v. Point Breeze Station Mail
JAMIE ELLIOTT |
POINT BREEZE STATION MAIL DEPARTMENT |
17-1326 |
February 9, 2017 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Jamie Elliott v. Point Breeze Station Mail |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3012739216 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, COWEN and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. Elliott's motion for a hearing, which may be construed as a request for oral argument, is denied. His motion for compensatory and punitive damages and other relief is also denied. |
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jamie Elliott v. Point Breeze Station Mail | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff - appellant: JAMIE ELLIOTT | |
Represented By: | Jamie Elliott |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant - appellee: POINT BREEZE STATION MAIL DEPARTMENT | |
Represented By: | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.