Abdul Ahad v. Warden Pike County Correctiona, et al
Plaintiff - Appellee: ABDUL AHAD
Defendant - Appellant: WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and THOMAS DECKER
Case Number: 17-1492
Filed: March 9, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Abdul Ahad v. Warden Pike County Correctiona, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellee: ABDUL AHAD
Represented By: Sandra L. Greene
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: WARDEN PIKE COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Represented By: Kate L. Mershimer
Represented By: Danielle K. Schuessler
Represented By: Melissa A. Swauger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellant: THOMAS DECKER
Represented By: Kate L. Mershimer
Represented By: Danielle K. Schuessler
Represented By: Melissa A. Swauger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?