Andrew Kortyna v. Lafayette College
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANDREW KORTYNA
Defendant - Appellee: LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Case Number: 17-1961
Filed: May 1, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 11, 2018 Andrew Kortyna v. Lafayette College

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 11, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3012900943 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: HARDIMAN, BIBAS and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 9. Authoring Judge: Bibas, previously filed under temporary seal on 3/30/18.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Andrew Kortyna v. Lafayette College
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: ANDREW KORTYNA
Represented By: Sidney L. Gold
Represented By: William Rieser
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LAFAYETTE COLLEGE
Represented By: Brittany E. Medio
Represented By: Joshua W. B. Richards
Represented By: John F. Stoviak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?