United States, et al v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: FREEDOM UNLIMITED INC, NORTHSIDE COALITION FOR FAIR HOUSING INC, THE HILL DISTRICT CONSENSUS GROUP INC and FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Defendant - Appellee: CITY OF PITTSBURGH and LUKE RAVENSTAHL, its Chief Officer
Case Number: 17-1987
Filed: May 5, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: False Claims Act

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 28, 2018 United States v. City of Pittsburgh
April 5, 2018 Summary United States v. City of Pittsburgh

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3012894893 ORDER AMENDING OPINION (Clerk) The opinion issued on March 28, 2018 is hereby amended to reflect that John C. Hansberry, Esq. argued the case on behalf of Appellees City of Pittsburgh and Luke Ravensthal, filed.
March 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3012887291 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: RESTREPO, GREENBERG and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 13. Judge: GREENBERG Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: United States, et al v. City of Pittsburgh, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: FREEDOM UNLIMITED INC
Represented By: Donald Driscoll
Represented By: Kevin L. Quisenberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: NORTHSIDE COALITION FOR FAIR HOUSING INC
Represented By: Donald Driscoll
Represented By: Kevin L. Quisenberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: THE HILL DISTRICT CONSENSUS GROUP INC
Represented By: Donald Driscoll
Represented By: Kevin L. Quisenberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: FAIR HOUSING PARTNERSHIP OF GREATER PITTSBURGH
Represented By: Donald Driscoll
Represented By: Kevin L. Quisenberry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Represented By: Adam B. Fischer
Represented By: John C. Hansberry
Represented By: Lourdes S. Ridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LUKE RAVENSTAHL, its Chief Officer
Represented By: Adam B. Fischer
Represented By: John C. Hansberry
Represented By: Lourdes S. Ridge
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?