Clayton Tanksley v. Lee Daniels, et al
Plaintiff - Appellant: CLAYTON PRINCE TANKSLEY
Defendant - Appellee: LEE DANIELS, LEE DANIELS ENTERTAINMENT, DANNY STRONG, DANNY STRONG PRODUCTIONS, TWENTY FIRST CENTURY FOX INC, Parent Company of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc, 20th Century Fox Film Corp, 20th Centrury Fox Television Inc, 20th Centruy TV Inc, 20th Century Fox International, 20th Century Fox International Television LLC and 20th Century, FOX NETWORK GROUP INC, Parent Company of Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Inc., Fox Digital Media, Fox International Channels, Inc., SHARON PINKENSON, Executive Director, GREATER PHILADELPHIA FILM OFFICE and LEAH DANIELS-BUTLER
Case Number: 17-2023
Filed: May 8, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Copyright

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 28, 2018 Summary Tanksley v. Daniels

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 28, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3013019254 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: CHAGARES, VANASKIE and FISHER, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 22. Judge: FISHER Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Clayton Tanksley v. Lee Daniels, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: CLAYTON PRINCE TANKSLEY
Represented By: Mary E. Bogan
Represented By: Predrag Filipovic
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LEE DANIELS
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LEE DANIELS ENTERTAINMENT
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DANNY STRONG
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: DANNY STRONG PRODUCTIONS
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: TWENTY FIRST CENTURY FOX INC, Parent Company of Fox Entertainment Group, Inc, 20th Century Fox Film Corp, 20th Centrury Fox Television Inc, 20th Centruy TV Inc, 20th Century Fox International, 20th Century Fox International Television LLC and 20th Century
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FOX NETWORK GROUP INC, Parent Company of Fox Broadcasting Company, Fox Television Stations, Inc., Fox Digital Media, Fox International Channels, Inc.
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SHARON PINKENSON, Executive Director
Represented By: Rigel C. Farr
Represented By: Charles M. Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: GREATER PHILADELPHIA FILM OFFICE
Represented By: Rigel C. Farr
Represented By: Charles M. Golden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: LEAH DANIELS-BUTLER
Represented By: Richard L. Stone
Represented By: Andrew J. Thomas
Represented By: Michael K. Twersky
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?