Andrea Sessoms v. University of Pennsylvania Tru
| ANDREA SESSOMS |
| UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES, doing business as THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM |
| 17-2369 |
| June 26, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Jobs |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Andrea Sessoms v. University of Pennsylvania Tru |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012961283
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: SMITH, HARDIMAN and ROTH, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 14. Judge: SMITH Authoring.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Andrea Sessoms v. University of Pennsylvania Tru | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: ANDREA SESSOMS | |
| Represented By: | Shelly G. Farber |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA TRUSTEES, doing business as THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM | |
| Represented By: | Todd A. Ewan |
| Represented By: | Michael R. Galey |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Mann |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
