Matthew Jones v. Sussex Correctional Institute
Defendant: SUSSEX CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Plaintiff - Appellant: MATTHEW JONES
Case Number: 17-2490
Filed: July 13, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 5, 2017 Matthew Jones v. Sussex Correctional Institute

RSS Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 3012794594 NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: SHWARTZ, KRAUSE and RENDELL, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. Motion to Set Aside Judgment is denied. --[Edited 12/05/2017 by AWI]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew Jones v. Sussex Correctional Institute
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: MATTHEW JONES
Represented By: Matthew Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SUSSEX CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Represented By:
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?