Brandy Kane v. Shawn Barger
Plaintiff - Appellant: BRANDY KANE
Defendant - Appellee: SHAWN BARGER, in his Individual Capacity as a Police Officer for the Borough of Coraopolis
Case Number: 17-3027
Filed: September 21, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
August 22, 2018 Summary Kane v. Barger

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3013014986 PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: CHAGARES, GREENBERG and FUENTES, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 22. Judge: FUENTES Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brandy Kane v. Shawn Barger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: BRANDY KANE
Represented By: Noah Geary
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: SHAWN BARGER, in his Individual Capacity as a Police Officer for the Borough of Coraopolis
Represented By: Mark R. Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?