Pamela Macknet v. University of Pennsylvania
Plaintiff - Appellant: PAMELA MACKNET
Defendant - Appellee: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Case Number: 17-3257
Filed: October 17, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 15, 2018 Pamela Macknet v. University of Pennsylvania

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 15, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 3012957517 NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: AMBRO, JORDAN and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 12. Judge: JORDAN Authoring.
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pamela Macknet v. University of Pennsylvania
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: PAMELA MACKNET
Represented By: Wayne A. Ely
Represented By: W. Charles Sipio
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
Represented By: Todd A. Ewan
Represented By: Michael R. Galey
Represented By: Benjamin C. Mann
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?