Ronald Totaro v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al

Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD N. TOTARO
Defendant - Appellee: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Case Number: 17-3613
Filed: November 30, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date FiledDescription
August 6, 2018 Ronald Totaro v. Warden Fort Dix FCI

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 6, 2018 3013000837 Opinion or Order of the Court NOT PRECEDENTIAL PER CURIAM OPINION Coram: MCKEE, VANASKIE and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 5. ALD-153. To the extent that Totato seeks any other relief from this Court, that relief is denied.
Search for this case: Ronald Totaro v. Warden Fort Dix FCI, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: RONALD N. TOTARO
Represented By: Ronald N. Totaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: WARDEN FORT DIX FCI
Represented By: Caroline A. Sadlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Represented By: Caroline A. Sadlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?