M. M. v. Paterson Board of Education
| M. M., individually and on behalf of K.M. |
| PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION |
| 17-3802 |
| December 29, 2017 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Civil Rights: Education |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| M. M. v. Paterson Board of Education |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
3012946944
NOT PRECEDENTIAL OPINION Coram: MCKEE, SHWARTZ and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges. Total Pages: 9. Judge: SHWARTZ Authoring. We will affirm the District Court's order denying M.M.'s preliminary injunction and deny Paterson's motion to strike.
|
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: M. M. v. Paterson Board of Education | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff - appellant: M. M., individually and on behalf of K.M. | |
| Represented By: | David R. Giles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant - appellee: PATERSON BOARD OF EDUCATION | |
| Represented By: | Frances E. Barto |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
