Daisy Solomon v. East Penn Manufacturing Co
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAISY SOLOMON
Defendant / Appellee: EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO
Case Number: 17-3818
Filed: December 28, 2017
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 17, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 17, 2018 Opinion or Order ORDER (JORDAN, SHWARTZ and KRAUSE, Circuit Judges) The appeal is dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction, filed. Panel No.: DLD-176. Shwartz, Authoring Judge. (CJG) [Entered: 04/17/2018 10:11 AM]
January 19, 2018 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellee East Penn Manufacturing Co to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal. Certificate of Service dated 01/19/2018. [17-3818] (BMK) [Entered: 01/19/2018 11:36 AM]
January 19, 2018 ECF FILER: RESPONSE filed by Appellant Daisy Solomon to letter advising of possible dismissal, filed. Certificate of Service dated 01/19/2018 by ECF. [17-3818]--[Edited 01/24/2018 by CJG] (DS) [Entered: 01/19/2018 04:40 PM]
January 18, 2018 CLERK ORDER granting Motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Daisy Solomon. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, not to exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 01/18/2018 08:17 AM]
January 9, 2018 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Brad M. Kushner on behalf of Respondent(s) East Penn Manufacturing Company. (BMK) [Entered: 01/09/2018 10:47 AM]
January 8, 2018 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee East Penn Manufacturing Co, filed. (GDM) [Entered: 01/08/2018 02:52 PM]
January 8, 2018 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Theresa M. Zechman on behalf of Respondent(s) East Penn Manufacturing Co.. (TMZ) [Entered: 01/08/2018 02:44 PM]
January 8, 2018 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Gary D. Melchionni on behalf of Respondent(s) East Penn Manufacturing Co.. (GDM) [Entered: 01/08/2018 02:40 PM]
December 29, 2017 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 12/29/2017 03:17 PM]
December 28, 2017 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 12/28/2017 10:52 AM]
December 28, 2017 MOTION filed by Appellant Daisy Solomon to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 12/28/2017 10:55 AM]
December 28, 2017 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Daisy Solomon in District Court No. 5-16-cv-06484. (CJG) [Entered: 12/28/2017 10:40 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Daisy Solomon v. East Penn Manufacturing Co
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DAISY SOLOMON
Represented By: Daisy Solomon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: EAST PENN MANUFACTURING CO
Represented By: Brad M. Kushner Esq.
Represented By: Gary D. Melchionni Esq.
Represented By: Theresa M. Zechman Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?