SodexoMAGIC LLC v. Drexel University
| DREXEL UNIVERSITY |
| SODEXOMAGIC LLC |
| 19-1107 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: Response filed by SodexoMAGIC LLC, Appellant in 19-1028/Appellee in 19-1107 in Opposition to Motion to Seal. Certificate of Service dated 03/04/2019. [19-1028, 19-1107]--[Edited 03/04/2019 by CJG] (CAB) [Entered: 03/04/2019 09:04 AM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. 1st Brief on behalf of Brief on behalf of Appellant SodexoMAGIC LLC due on or before 04/08/2019. Appendix due on or before 04/08/2019. [19-1028, 19-1107] (CJG) [Entered: 02/26/2019 09:28 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellee Drexel University in 19-1028, Appellant Drexel University in 19-1107 to seal The documents that have been filed under seal in the District Court remain under seal in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals.. Certificate of Service dated 02/22/2019. Service made by ECF. [19-1028, 19-1107] (SAC) [Entered: 02/22/2019 03:05 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. [19-1028, 19-1107] (TNH) [Entered: 02/05/2019 04:21 PM] |
| Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 01/31/2019. (CJG) [Entered: 01/31/2019 11:31 AM] |
| Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 01/30/2019. (JK) [Entered: 01/31/2019 10:45 AM] |
| FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jared D. Bayer, Esq., Stephen A. Cozen, Esq., Robert W. Hayes, Esq. and Thomas A. Leonard, IV, Esq. for Drexel University requesting Payment of the Filing Fees to the District Court and the filing of the Transcript Purchase Order on or before 02/13/2019. (CJG) [Entered: 01/30/2019 10:37 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Drexel University advising this court that transcripts are already on file in the District Court. [19-1107] (SAC) [Entered: 01/30/2019 02:33 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Drexel University, received. [19-1107] (RWH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:28 PM] |
| ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Drexel University, filed. [19-1107] (RWH) [Entered: 01/25/2019 03:27 PM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Drexel University, filed. [19-1107] (RWH) [Entered: 01/16/2019 11:10 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert W. Hayes on behalf of Appellant(s) Drexel University. [19-1107] (RWH) [Entered: 01/16/2019 11:09 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jared D. Bayer on behalf of Appellant(s) Drexel University. --[Edited 01/16/2019 by CJG to unapply from the appeal at No. 19-1028.] (JDB) [Entered: 01/16/2019 03:51 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Glen D. Nager; Cynthia Barmore on behalf of Appellee(s) SodexoMAGIC, LLC. [19-1107] (CAB) [Entered: 01/15/2019 01:43 PM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee SodexoMAGIC LLC, filed. [19-1107] (CAB) [Entered: 01/15/2019 01:45 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Stephen A. Cozen on behalf of Appellant(s) Drexel University. [19-1107] (SAC) [Entered: 01/15/2019 03:52 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 01/14/2019 10:54 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Drexel University in District Court No. 2-16-cv-05144. (JK) [Entered: 01/14/2019 10:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
