USA v. Kevyn Rakowski
| KEVYN RAKOWSKI |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-1237 |
| January 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Joint Motion filed by Appellants' for Sixty (60) Day Extension of Time to file Opening Briefs and Joint Appendix. Certificate of Service dated 03/15/2019. Service made by ECF. [19-1237, 19-1105, 19-1136, 19-1190]--[Edited 03/15/2019 by CJG] (HEK) [Entered: 03/15/2019 12:27 PM] |
| Appellant Kevyn Rakowski verbally granted an extension of time to file brief & appendix until 03/25/2019 pursuant to Third Cir. LAR 31.4. (CJG) [Entered: 02/19/2019 01:37 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert F. Kravetz on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [19-1237] (RFK) [Entered: 02/13/2019 12:08 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Lesley F. Wolf, Assistant United States Attorney on behalf of Appellee(s) Department of Justice. [19-1237] (LFW) [Entered: 02/08/2019 12:00 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Kevyn Rakowski due on or before 03/11/2019. Appendix due on or before 03/11/2019. Presentence Report due on or before 03/11/2019. (CJG) [Entered: 02/08/2019 02:23 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Kevyn Rakowski advising this court that transcripts are already on file in the District Court. [19-1237] (HEK) [Entered: 02/08/2019 09:55 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Lisa A. Mathewson on behalf of Appellant(s) Kevyn Rakowski. [19-1237] (LAM) [Entered: 02/05/2019 09:50 AM] |
| ECF FILER: CRIMINAL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Kevyn Rakowski, filed. [19-1237] (HEK) [Entered: 01/30/2019 03:33 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Henry E. Klingeman on behalf of Appellant(s) Kevyn Rakowski. [19-1237] (HEK) [Entered: 01/30/2019 03:30 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 01/25/2019 07:58 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER The appeals at Nos. 19-1105, 19-1136, 19-1190 & 19-1237 are consolidated for purposes of disposition only. Appellants are encouraged to consult with one another regarding the contents of their briefs as the Court disfavors repetitive briefs. The parties may file a consolidated brief or join in or adopt portions by reference. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(i). In addition, the Government may elect to file a consolidated brief. The Government is directed to notify the Clerk's Office in writing of such an election prior to the Government's first briefing deadline. The parties are directed to electronically file documents on the Court's docket as follows: Appellants: All case opening forms, motions, and briefs must be filed only in the appeal number assigned to the filer's notice of appeal. If a document is being filed jointly by multiple appellants, the document must be filed only in the appeal numbers assigned to the filing appellants. Government: All case opening forms must be filed in all appeals in which the Government intends to participate. All motions should be filed only in those cases for which the relief is being requested. All responsive briefs should be filed only in the appeal to which the Government is responding. If the Government is filing a consolidated response brief, the brief must be filed in all appeals to which the Government is responding, filed. [19-1105, 19-1136, 19-1190, 19-1237] (CJG) [Entered: 01/25/2019 08:05 AM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Kevyn Rakowski in District Court No. 1-15-cr-00023-005. (CJG) [Entered: 01/25/2019 07:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
