Frederick Banks v. Postmasters of Pittsburgh, et al
MAILROOM SUPERVISOR, Allegheny County Jail, DEMMIL WALKER, U.S. Marshall, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, UNITED STATES POST OFFICE, ALLEGHENY COUNTY SHERIFFS OFFICE, POSTMASTERS OF PITTSBURGH, U.S. Post Office, 7th Avenue & Grant Street, Pittsburgh Pa. 15219, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, DAVID ANDERCHAK, U.S. Postal Inspector and ORLANDO L. HARPER, Warden at Allegheny County Jail |
FREDERICK H. BANKS |
19-1337 |
February 7, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Mr. Frederick H. Banks, filed. (CLW) [Entered: 04/01/2019 04:57 PM] |
PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Mr. Frederick H. Banks, filed. (CLW) [Entered: 04/01/2019 04:59 PM] |
IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Mr. Frederick H. Banks, filed. (CLW) [Entered: 04/01/2019 04:56 PM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Frederick H. Banks to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 03/28/2019. Certificate of Service dated 03/14/2019. Service made by US mail. (CLW) [Entered: 04/01/2019 04:55 PM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Laura S. Irwin, Esq. for Postmasters of Pittsburgh, United States Post Office, David Anderchak and Demmil Walker requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 03/26/2019. (CLW) [Entered: 03/12/2019 12:00 PM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 02/07/2019 04:22 PM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Frederick H. Banks in District Court No. 2-18-cv-01604. (LMR) [Entered: 02/07/2019 04:17 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.