Robert W Mauthe MD PC v. Spreemo Inc, et al
ROBERT W MAUTHE MD PC, a Pennsylvania Corporation, Individually and as the Representative of a Class of Similarly-Situated Persons |
HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP INC and SPREEMO INC |
19-1470 |
March 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Robert W Mauthe MD PC v. Spreemo Inc |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Bart T. Murphy on behalf of Appellee(s) Spreemo, Inc. and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. [19-1470] (BTM) [Entered: 04/25/2019 11:58 AM] |
ECF FILER: TRANSCRIPT PURCHASE ORDER (Part II) filed by UBIQUS for date(s) of 1/8/2019. [19-1470] (JMG) [Entered: 04/22/2019 09:22 AM] |
ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Robert W Mauthe MD PC, filed. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:55 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Richard Shenkan on behalf of Appellant(s) Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C.. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:54 PM] |
ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Robert W Mauthe MD PC, received. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:57 PM] |
ORDER to Court Reporter Ms. Joan Carr directing transcripts, ordered on 03/19/2019 , to be filed by 04/22/2019. (MB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 04:25 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Frederick A. Tecce, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Spreemo, Inc. and The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.. [19-1470] (FAT) [Entered: 03/19/2019 04:33 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel J. Cohen on behalf of Appellant(s) Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C.. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:53 PM] |
ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Robert W Mauthe MD PC advising this court that transcripts are needed. Requested date(s) are: January 8, 2019, to be filed by Joan Carr. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:59 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Phillip A. Bock on behalf of Appellant(s) Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C.. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:52 PM] |
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Spreemo Inc, filed. [19-1470] (DRM) [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:16 PM] |
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Hartford Financial Services Group Inc, filed. [19-1470] (DRM) [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:17 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Derek R. Molter on behalf of Appellee(s) Spreemo, Inc. and The Hartford Financial Services Group. [19-1470] (DRM) [Entered: 03/19/2019 12:15 PM] |
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Robert W Mauthe MD PC, filed. [19-1470] (PAB) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:51 PM] |
Notice received from the district court that the docketing and filing fees were paid by the appellant on 03/07/2019. (DW) [Entered: 03/08/2019 01:20 PM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (MB) [Entered: 03/05/2019 11:53 AM] |
Certified Copy of Amended Notice of Appeal filed 02/28/2019 received from Clerk of District Court. (MB) [Entered: 03/05/2019 11:56 AM] |
ORDER (Clerk) The above-docketed appeal is hereby STAYED pending decision in Appeal No. 18-2119, Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. National Imaging Associates, Inc. and Appeal No. 18-2894, Robert W. Mauthe, M.D., P.C. v. Optum, Inc. Within fourteen (14) days of the date the second mandate issues in these cases, the parties must advise the Court, in writing, what effect, if any, the decisions in Nos. 18-2119 and 19-2894 have on the pending appeal, filed. (MB) [Entered: 03/05/2019 01:15 PM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Robert W Mauthe MD PC in District Court No. 5-18-cv-01902. (MB) [Entered: 03/05/2019 11:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.