Edward Semulka v. Robert Clark, et al
WASHINGTON COUNTY DRUG TASK FORCE, UNION TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, ATTORNEY ROBERT CLARK, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, CANONSBURG POLICE DEPARTMENT, BETHEL PARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, JAMES A. VILLANOVA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PITTSBURGH POLICE DEPARTMENT, WASHINGTON COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA BAR ASSOCIATION, CHEVRON USA INC and COLETTA JAMES |
EDWARD P. SEMULKA |
19-1570 |
March 13, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert J. Grimm on behalf of Appellee(s) Robert Clark. [19-1570] (CKD) [Entered: 05/08/2019 01:55 PM] |
CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR Misc. 107.2(b), for failure to file a brief and appendix on behalf of appellant. Case terminated on 05/08/2019. (CLW) [Entered: 05/08/2019 03:02 PM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Robert J. Grimm, Esq. for Robert Clark requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 05/17/2019. (CLW) [Entered: 05/03/2019 05:27 PM] |
BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Edward P. Semulka due on or before 04/29/2019. Appendix due on or before 04/29/2019. (CLW) [Entered: 03/18/2019 09:16 AM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CLW) [Entered: 03/13/2019 03:43 PM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Edward P. Semulka in District Court No. 2-17-cv-00846. (CLW) [Entered: 03/13/2019 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.