In re: Andrea Newton
Appellant: MARK NEWTON
Appellee: CLINTON PALMER
Undetermined: In re: ANDREA NEWTON, aka Andrea Rutty Newton
Case Number: 19-1633
Filed: March 22, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 10, 2019 Argument by Appellant Andrea Newton in Support of Appeal, filed. Certificate of Service dated 04/12/2019. Service made by ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 04/12/2019 03:22 PM]
April 8, 2019 ECF FILER: RESPONSE filed by Appellee Clinton Palmer to Motion to Stay Pending Appeal. Certificate of Service dated 04/08/2019. Service made by US mail. [19-1633]--[Edited 04/08/2019 by TMM] (BWR) [Entered: 04/08/2019 02:47 PM]
April 1, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellants Ms. Andrea Newton and Mr. Mark Newton for Emergent Stay of District Court Order Denying a Stay of the Orders by the United States Bankruptcy Court . Response due on 04/08/2019. Certificate of Service dated 03/26/2019. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 04/01/2019 06:01 PM]
April 1, 2019 CLERK ORDER granting motions to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Appellants Mr. Mark Newton and Ms. Andrea Newton. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order, filed. (PDB) [Entered: 04/01/2019 05:29 PM]
March 27, 2019 LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case will be submitted to a panel of this Court for possible summary action AND for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 03/27/2019 02:22 PM]
March 22, 2019 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/22/2019 11:57 AM]
March 22, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant Ms. Andrea Newton to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 03/22/2019 11:58 AM]
March 22, 2019 MOTION filed by Appellant Mr. Mark Newton to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (PDB) [Entered: 03/22/2019 12:00 PM]
March 22, 2019 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Ms. Andrea Newton and Mr. Mark Newton in District Court No. 2-17-cv-08377,2-17-cv-08378,2-17-cv-08574,2-17-cv-11637,2-17-cv-11856,2-17-cv-11859. (PDB) [Entered: 03/22/2019 11:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Andrea Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: MARK NEWTON
Represented By: Mark Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: CLINTON PALMER
Represented By: Bruce W. Radowitz Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Undetermined: In re: ANDREA NEWTON, aka Andrea Rutty Newton
Represented By: Andrea Newton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?