Shaheed Williams v. Jamie Ferdarko, et al
| SHAHEED WILLIAMS |
| WILLIAM M. SUTHERLAND, MAXA, LISA ZUPSIC, JAMIE FERDARKO, GARY PRINKEY and KIMBERLY SMITH |
| 19-1647 |
| March 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Shaheed Williams v. Jamie Ferdarko |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (Clerk) The motion is construed as a motion to stay the briefing schedule pending disposition of the motion for appointment of counsel. So construed, the motion is granted temporarily to provide Appellant an opportunity to comply with this Court's Order dated May 9, 2019, directing him to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis for the appointment of counsel within fourteen (14) days of the date of that Order. If Appellant files the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as directed, the motion for counsel will then be submitted to a panel of this Court for consideration, and the briefing schedule will continue to be stayed pending disposition of the motion. If Appellant fails to comply with the Court's May 9, 2019 Order, the Clerk will immediately set a deadline for Appellant to file the brief and appendix, and no further action will be taken on the motion for appointment of counsel, filed. (PDB) [Entered: 05/10/2019 05:39 PM]
|
| Notifying appellant/petitioner that no action will be taken on the motion for appoinment of counsel as appellant/petitioner has not submitted a motion for in forma pauperis status. Appellant/Petitioner is directed to file a motion for in forma pauperis status within 14 days from date of notice. (PDB) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:50 AM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Shaheed Williams for Extension of Time to File Brief and Appendix for thirty (30) Days. Certificate of Service dated 04/25/2019. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:43 AM] |
| MOTION by Shaheed Williams for Appointment of Counsel, received and not filed. Certificate of Service dated 04/25/2019. Service made by US mail. (PDB) [Entered: 05/09/2019 10:48 AM] |
| ECF FILER: DUPLICATE ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) Jamie Ferdarko, Kimberly Smith, Garl L. Prinkey. [19-1647]--[Edited 04/22/2019 by TMM] (DBM) [Entered: 04/22/2019 02:54 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) Jamie Ferdarko, Kimberly Smith, Gary L. Prinkey. [19-1647] (DBM) [Entered: 04/22/2019 02:50 PM] |
| Certified Copy of Amended Notice of Appeal filed 04/11/2019 received from Clerk of District Court. (PDB) [Entered: 04/11/2019 05:49 PM] |
| LETTER to Yana L. Warshafsky, Esq. for Kimberly Smith, Gary Prinkey and Jamie Ferdarko requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 04/25/2019. (PDB) [Entered: 04/11/2019 10:32 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Benjamin M. Lombard on behalf of Appellee(s) William M. Sutherland, Dr. Maxa, Lisa Zupsic. [19-1647] (BML) [Entered: 04/09/2019 01:08 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samuel H. Foreman on behalf of Appellee(s) William Sutherland, Dr. Maxa, Lisa Zupsic. [19-1647] (SHF) [Entered: 04/09/2019 02:38 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Shaheed Williams due on or before 05/08/2019. Appendix due on or before 05/08/2019. (PDB) [Entered: 03/29/2019 05:02 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2019 04:26 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Shaheed Williams in District Court No. 1-17-cv-00313. (PDB) [Entered: 03/27/2019 04:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
