In re: David Ward
| In re: DAVID JAMES WARD |
| FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE and SUSAN D WIGENTON |
| 19-1693 |
| April 3, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ben Kuruvilla, AUSA on behalf of Respondent(s) FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE. [19-1693] (BK) [Entered: 04/25/2019 05:44 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from J. Andrew Ruymann, Chief, Civil Division on behalf of Respondent(s) FEDERAL PROBATION OFFICE. [19-1693] (JAR) [Entered: 04/25/2019 05:51 PM] |
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner David James Ward, filed. (KR) [Entered: 04/15/2019 11:35 AM]
|
| PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Petitioner David James Ward, filed. (KR) [Entered: 04/12/2019 04:16 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Petitioner David James Ward to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 04/22/2019. Certificate of Service dated 04/12/2019. Service made by ECF. (KR) [Entered: 04/12/2019 04:14 PM] |
| CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE for writ of mandamus and motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Service made by Petitioner David James Ward on 04/08/2019 by US mail, filed. (KR) [Entered: 04/12/2019 03:58 PM] |
| NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner David Ward requesting Fee or IFP, Certified Prison Account Statement and Certificate of Service. Compliance due 04/17/2019. (KR) [Entered: 04/03/2019 08:49 AM] |
| PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner David Ward. (KR) [Entered: 04/03/2019 08:33 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
