Wayne Prater v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor
ELIZABETH JURY, Nurse at SCI Houtzdale, RICHARD, MAINES, K. SHEA, JANET PEARSON, Corrections Health Care Administrator (CHCA), WILLIAM W. NORVELL, III, Maintenance Supervisor at SCI Houtzdale, LONG, Doctor, Correctional Officer (C/O) at SCI Houtzdale, POBORSKI, FLORA, FREDDY NUNEZ, Hearing Examiner, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Officer, KENNETH HOLLIBAUGH, Deputy Superintendent at SCI Houtzdale, BARRY SMITH, JAMES, Lieutenant (Lt.) SCI Houtzdale, T. KNOWLES, Security Captain at SCI Houtzdale, JOEL BARROWS, Major at SCI Houtzdale, DUFORE, Correctional Offiver (C/O) at SCI Houtzdale, MUHAMMAD NAJI, Medical Director at SCI Houtzdale, JOSEPH H. DUPONT, G COGAN, LARUE, Counselor at SCI Houtzdale, JOSEPH SILVA, Director Health Bureau Care Services, DAREN GINTER, Unit Manager at SCI Houtzdale, LARUE, Sergeant (Sgt) at SCI Houtzdale, ADREN SMITH, Director Health Care Services, MICHELLE IVICIC, Corrections Classifications & Program Manager (CCPM), PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PEGGY BARNS, Physician Assistan (P/A) at SCI Houtzdale, KELLY, Lieutenant (Lt.) at SCi Houtzdale, REBECCA REIFER, Superintendent Assistant at SCI Houtzdale, MOONEY, Lieutenant (Lt.) t SCi Houtzdale and KERI MOORE, Grievance Officer |
WAYNE PRATER |
19-1732 |
April 3, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
![]() |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Wayne Prater to Legal Division letter advising of possible dismissal, filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/05/2019. Service made by US mail. (TMK) [Entered: 05/10/2019 10:01 AM] |
CLERK ORDER granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis by Appellant Wayne Prater. The appeal will be submitted to a panel for determination under 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(e)(2) or for summary action under Third Circuit L.A.R. 27.4 and I.O.P. 10.6. Appellant may submit argument, which should not exceed 5 pages, in support of the appeal. The document, with certificate of service, must be filed with the clerk within 21 days of the date of this order, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 05/02/2019 07:34 AM] |
MOTION filed by Appellant Wayne Prater to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 04/29/2019. Certificate of Service dated 04/15/2019. Service made by US mail. (TMK) [Entered: 04/25/2019 07:42 AM] |
PRISONER ACCOUNT STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Wayne Prater, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 04/25/2019 07:43 AM] |
IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER ADDENDUM on behalf of Appellant Wayne Prater, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 04/25/2019 07:44 AM] |
IN FORMA PAUPERIS PRISONER AUTHORIZATION on behalf of Appellant Wayne Prater, filed. (TMK) [Entered: 04/25/2019 07:44 AM] |
LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (MW) [Entered: 04/16/2019 04:42 PM] |
ECF FILER: NOT PARTICIPATING: Attorney General Pennsylvania for Peggy Barns, Joel Barrows, G Cogan, Dufore, Joseph H. Dupont, Flora, Daren Ginter, Kenneth Hollibaugh, Michelle Ivicic, James, Elizabeth Jury, Kelly, T. Knowles, Larue, Larue, Long, Maines, Mooney, Keri Moore, Muhammad Naji, William W. Norvell, III, Freddy Nunez, Janet Pearson, Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, Poborski, Rebecca Reifer, Richard, K. Shea, Joseph Silva, Adren Smith, Barry Smith and Dorina Varner will not participate in this appeal, received. [19-1732] (SAK) [Entered: 04/15/2019 12:46 PM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Wayne Prater in District Court No. 3-19-cv-00019. (TMK) [Entered: 04/03/2019 08:27 AM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMK) [Entered: 04/03/2019 08:30 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.