Luis Gonzalez v. Attorney General
| LUIS GONZALEZ, AKA Luis Ray Gonzalez Mesinas |
| ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 19-1770 |
| April 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to extend time to file response filed by Petitioner Luis Gonzalez, filed. The foregoing motion is granted. Petitioner may respond on or before June 17, 2019, to Respondents motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction and response to Petitioners motion to stay removal. (SH) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:23 PM]
|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Luis Gonzalez to Extend Time to File a Response to motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction and a response to motion to stay removal for 30 days. Response due on 05/28/2019. Certificate of Service dated 04/30/2019. Service made by US mail. (LMR) [Entered: 05/17/2019 01:06 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Motion filed by Respondent Attorney General to to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction and a Response to motion to stay removal. Certificate of Service dated 04/29/2019. Service made by US mail. [19-1770] (LM) [Entered: 04/29/2019 03:17 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Petitioner Luis Gonzalez due on or before 06/04/2019. Appendix due on or before 06/04/2019. (LMR) [Entered: 04/25/2019 08:50 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD, filed. [19-1770] (TS) [Entered: 04/24/2019 02:05 PM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) temporarily granting motion for stay of removal in accordance with the Standing Order of the Court dated August 5, 2015. Removal is stayed until such time as the Court can consider the motion for stay of removal, filed. (LMR) [Entered: 04/17/2019 08:41 AM]
|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Luis Gonzalez to stay removal. Response due on 04/29/2019. (LMR) [Entered: 04/17/2019 08:08 AM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) directing the Executive Office of Immigration Review to file the adminstrative record. (SLC) [Entered: 04/08/2019 11:55 AM]
|
| MOTION filed by Petitioner Luis Gonzalez to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Response due on 04/18/2019. Certificate of Service dated 04/08/2019. Service made by Email. (SLC) [Entered: 04/08/2019 12:02 PM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) granting motion to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner Luis Gonzalez, filed. (SLC) [Entered: 04/08/2019 12:04 PM]
|
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Lindsay Donahue on behalf of Respondent(s) Lindsay Donahue. [19-1770] (LM) [Entered: 04/08/2019 02:31 PM] |
| AGENCY CASE DOCKETED. Petition filed by Luis Gonzalez. Certificate of Service dated 04/08/2019. Service made by ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 04/08/2019 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Luis Gonzalez v. Attorney General | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Lindsay Donahue Esq. |
| Represented By: | William P. Barr Esq. |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Represented By: | Lindsay Marshall |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: LUIS GONZALEZ, AKA Luis Ray Gonzalez Mesinas | |
| Represented By: | Luis Gonzalez |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
