USA v. Tara Glass
| TARA GLASS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-1815 |
| April 11, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (Clerk) No action will be taken on the government's motion to dismiss for 30 days from this order. No action will be taken on the government's letter suggesting that the Court vacate its order appointing Mr. Bitar, as the government lacks standing to make this request. Mr. Bitar was appointed pursuant to Third Circuit Local Appellate Rule 109.1. If Mr. Bitar or the appellant believes new counsel is warranted, one or both may file an appropriate motion. Unless the appellant or her current counsel moves for appointment of new counsel, the appellant's counsel must file a response to the government's motion within 30 days of this order, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 05/29/2019 10:57 AM]
|
| ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Norman Gross, Esq. for Appellee USA Letter suggesting that the Court vacate its order appointing Andrew Bitar, Esq., as counsel for appellant.. Certificate of Service dated 05/22/2019. Service made by ECF, Email, US mail. [19-1815] (NG) [Entered: 05/22/2019 02:52 PM] |
|
ORDER appointing Andrew Bitar, Esq. as CJA counsel to represent Appellant Tara Glass, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 05/17/2019 10:54 AM]
|
|
ORDER (NYGAARD, Circuit Judge) The CJA Form 23 treated as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel is granted. Counsel will be appointed under the Criminal Justice Act, filed. Panel No.: FCO-044. Nygaard, Authoring Judge. (CJG) [Entered: 05/17/2019 10:53 AM]
|
| ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Norman Gross, Esq. for Appellee USA requesting Court to withhold ruling on the Government's motion to dismiss appeal pending investigation into appellant's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.. Certificate of Service dated 05/16/2019. Service made by US mail. [19-1815] (NG) [Entered: 05/16/2019 11:50 AM] |
| Updated CJA Form 23 Financial Affidavit from Appellant Tara Glass treated as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel under the Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 05/15/2019 09:47 AM] |
| RESPONSE on behalf of Appellant Tara Glass to motion to dismiss case for untimely filing, filed. Certificate of Service dated 05/08/2019. Service made by US mail. (CJG) [Entered: 05/15/2019 10:50 AM] |
|
ORDER (PORTER, Circuit Judge) The Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal of Supervised-Release Conditions is denied. This type of relief must be sought from the district court in the first instance. See Fed. R. App. P. 8(a)(1) & 9(b). The appellant did not do so, and neither did she show that moving first in the district court would be impracticable. See Fed. R. App. P. 8(a)(2)(A)(i). This order does not prevent the appellant from filing a new stay motion in this Court, if necessary, after seeking relief from the district court, filed. Panel No.: ECO-034. Porter, Authoring Judge. (CJG) [Entered: 05/10/2019 04:30 PM]
|
| CLERK ORDER no action will be taken on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis as it is unnecessary, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 05/10/2019 09:08 AM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION filed Pro Se by Appellant Tara Glass for Stay Pending Appeal of Supervised-Release Conditions. Certificate of Service dated 05/05/2019. Service made by US mail. (CJG) [Entered: 05/10/2019 02:19 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellee USA to dismiss case for untimely filing. Certificate of Service dated 05/04/2019. Service made by ECF, US mail. [19-1815] (NG) [Entered: 05/04/2019 04:54 PM] |
| CJA Form 23 Financial Affidavit from Appellant Tara Glass treated as a Motion for Appointment of Counsel under the Provisions of the Criminal Justice Act, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:51 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Norman Gross, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [19-1815] (NG) [Entered: 05/03/2019 09:57 AM] |
|
ORDER (Clerk) Action on the motion to proceed in forma pauperis is deferred until Appellant returns a CJA 23 form within 14 days of the date of this order, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 05/02/2019 08:17 AM]
|
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:59 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mark E. Coyne, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [19-1815] (MEC) [Entered: 04/11/2019 01:33 PM] |
| MOTION filed by Appellant Tara Glass to Proceed In Forma Pauperis for the Appointment of Counsel. (CJG) [Entered: 04/16/2019 01:47 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Tara Glass in District Court No. 1-12-cr-00542-001. (CJG) [Entered: 04/11/2019 11:56 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Tara Glass | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: TARA GLASS | |
| Represented By: | Tara Glass |
| Represented By: | Andrew Bitar Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Mark E. Coyne Esq. |
| Represented By: | Norman Gross Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
