USA v. Fuhai Li
| FUHAI LI |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-1875 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| FOLLOW UP LETTER to Michelle L. Olshefski, Esq., Jenny P. Roberts, Esq. and Francis P. Sempa, Esq. for USA requesting Appearance Form within 14 days. (CJG) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:26 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michelle L. Olshefski, Assistant U.S. Attorney on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [19-1875] (MLO) [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:30 PM] |
| FOLLOW UP LETTER to David S. Bahuriak, Esq. for Fuhai Li requesting the following documents: Appearance Form, Information Statement, and Transcript Purchase Order within 14 days. (CJG) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:23 PM] |
ORDER (Clerk) The Order entered April 17, 2019, appointing David S. Bahuriak and Michael E. Weinstein as counsel for Appellant under the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act is hereby vacated having been issued in error, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 04/24/2019 10:03 AM]
|
|
ORDER appointing David S. Bahuriak and Michael E. Weinstein, Esq. as CJA counsel to continue to represent Appellant Fuhai Li, filed. [-VACATED Per Clerk's 4/24/19 Order,]--[Edited 04/24/2019 by CJG] (CJG) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:03 PM]
|
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:05 PM] |
| CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Fuhai Li in District Court No. 3-16-cr-00194-001. (CJG) [Entered: 04/17/2019 03:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
