In re: 40 Lakeview Drive LLC
GRACE S. WONG |
QUINCY WONG and JAY L. LUBETKIN, Chapter 7 Trustee |
In re: 40 LAKEVIEW DRIVE, LLC |
19-2054 |
May 15, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NONCOMPLIANCE No action will be taken on Appellant's motion to reopen. The District Court advised this Court that it has not received the required fee for this appeal. Appellant is directed to contact the District Court directly regarding the payment issue. The motion to reopen will not be submitted to the Court until the fee has been paid to the District Court. (SLC) [Entered: 07/10/2019 11:09 AM] |
ECF FILER: SUPPLEMENTAL Motion filed by Appellant Ms. Grace S. Wong to Reopen Case. Certificate of Service dated 06/29/2019. Service made by 3rd party, ECF, Email. [19-2054] (GSW) [Entered: 06/29/2019 03:06 PM] |
CLERK ORDER dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 06/20/2019. (SLC) [Entered: 06/20/2019 02:22 PM] |
FOLLOW UP LETTER to Lawrence K. Lesnik, Esq. for Jay L. Lubetkin and Harold C. Petzold, Esq. for Quincy Wong requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 07/05/2019. (SLC) [Entered: 06/20/2019 02:12 PM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 05/15/2019 07:31 AM] |
CLERK ORDER - RULE 6(b)(2)(A) staying case pending disposition of post decision motion(s). (SLC) [Entered: 05/15/2019 07:50 AM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Ms. Grace S. Wong in District Court No. 2-18-cv-14201. (SLC) [Entered: 05/15/2019 07:28 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.