Shavez HoldenIn re: Shavez Holden
| SGT. KOPCHICK, C.O. 2, S.C.I. Forest, In re: SHAWVEZ NELSON A/K/A SHAVEZ HOLDEN, ZACHARY J. MOSLAK, Chief Hearing Examiner, G. GREGORY, C.O. Trainee, S.C.I. Forest, BEST, C.O. Trainee, S.C.I. Forest, KIM SMITH, C.H.C.A., S.C.I. Forest, T. WILLIAMS, Hearing Examiner, PA D.O.C., N. BURKETT, C.O. 1, S.C.I. Forest, SUSAN PARADISE BAXTER, JOSEPH H. DUPONT, Chief Hearing Examiner, D. DAVIS, Security Lt./PREA, BROCIOUS, C.O. 1, DORINA VARNER, Chief Grievance Coordinator, CAPTAIN CARTER, Security/Intelligence Gathering Capt., S.C.I. Forest, D. DICKEY, Security/Intelligence Gatherin Lt., S.C.I. Forest, JOHN E. WETZEL, Secretary of Corrections, PA D.O.C., DR. SIMON, L.P.M., S.C.I. Forest, CAPTAIN GILL, R.H.U. Capt., S.C.I. Forest, J. SCHNECK, Hearing Examiner, PA D.O.C., J. BEATTY, C.O. 1, S.C.I. Forest, SGT. KEMP, C.O.2, S.C.I. Forest, MICHAEL OVERMYER, Superintendent, S.C.I. Forest, KERRI CROSS, Hearing Examiner, PA D.O.C., PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. BEATTY, C.O. 1, S.C. I. Forest, O. SLATER, C.O. 1, S.C.I. Forest, L. REEHER, Superintendants Assisant, S.C.I. Forest and FICUS, Hearing Examiner, PA D.O.C. |
| 19-2687 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| NONCOMPLIANCE Order sent to Petitioner Shavez Holden requesting Fee or Motion to procced in forma pauperis, Certified prison account statement and Certificate of service.. Compliance due 08/08/2019. (KR) [Entered: 07/25/2019 10:27 AM] |
| PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner Shavez Holden. (KR) [Entered: 07/25/2019 10:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
