Labib Riachi v. Prometheus Group, et al
Defendant / Appellee: PROMETHEUS GROUP and FIRST CHOICE FOR CONTINENCE INC
Plaintiff / Appellant: LABIB RIACHI
Case Number: 19-2768
Filed: August 2, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 9, 2020 Labib Riachi v. Prometheus Group

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 9, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jason D. Gregoire on behalf of Appellee(s) The Prometheus Group. [19-2768] (JDG) [Entered: 09/09/2019 12:04 PM]
September 5, 2019 Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (TNH) [Entered: 09/05/2019 01:02 PM]
September 3, 2019 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee First Choice for Continence Inc, filed. [19-2768] (MSH) [Entered: 09/03/2019 03:11 PM]
September 3, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Michael S. Horn on behalf of Appellee(s) First Choice for Continence, Inc.. [19-2768] (MSH) [Entered: 09/03/2019 03:09 PM]
August 22, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ronald T. Nagle on behalf of Appellant(s) LABIB RIACHI. [19-2768] (RTN) [Entered: 08/22/2019 03:09 PM]
August 22, 2019 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Labib Riachi advising this court that transcripts are not needed. [19-2768] (RTN) [Entered: 08/22/2019 03:10 PM]
August 22, 2019 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Labib Riachi, filed. [19-2768] (RTN) [Entered: 08/22/2019 03:11 PM]
August 22, 2019 ECF FILER: LETTER from Attorney Ronald T. Nagle, Esq. for Appellant Labib Riachi informing the Court that counsel for Plaintiff will be on vacation until September 3, 2019. Certificate of Service dated 08/22/2019. Service made by ECF. [19-2768] (RTN) [Entered: 08/22/2019 03:20 PM]
August 22, 2019 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Labib Riachi, received. [19-2768] (RTN) [Entered: 08/22/2019 03:07 PM]
August 22, 2019 Attorney Bar status modified for Matthew J. Borger, Esq. for Prometheus Group. Status is now active. (TMK) [Entered: 08/22/2019 12:09 PM]
August 21, 2019 NOTICE REGARDING ATTORNEY STATUS for APPEARANCE FORM filed by Attorney Matthew J. Borger, Esq. for Appellee Prometheus Group. Counsel's current status in this Court's attorney rolls is inactive. An attorney must have active status in order to appear before this Court. R.A.D.E. 17.3. If you wish to return to active status or if you believe that you have been marked inactive in error, please complete the Attorney Admission Renewal/Adjustment of Status Form available on this Court's website by 09/04/2019. Future filings will not be accepted from an attorney in inactive status. (TMK) [Entered: 08/21/2019 09:50 AM]
August 20, 2019 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Michael J. Lauricella, Esq. for First Choice for Continence Inc requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/03/2019. Disclosure Statement on or before 09/03/2019. (KR) [Entered: 08/20/2019 04:09 PM]
August 20, 2019 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Ronald T. Nagle, Esq. for Labib Riachi requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 09/03/2019. Information Statement on or before 09/03/2019. Concise Summary on or before 09/03/2019. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 09/03/2019. (KR) [Entered: 08/20/2019 04:04 PM]
August 15, 2019 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Prometheus Group, filed. [19-2768] (MJB) [Entered: 08/15/2019 04:39 PM]
August 15, 2019 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Matthew J. Borger, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) The Prometheus Group. [19-2768] (MJB) [Entered: 08/15/2019 04:32 PM]
August 2, 2019 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (KR) [Entered: 08/02/2019 03:18 PM]
August 2, 2019 Appendix Citation Notice sent to Ronald T. Nagle, Esq., Susan C. Cassell, Esq., Michael J. Lauricella, Esq.. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 08/16/2019. (KR) [Entered: 08/02/2019 03:20 PM]
August 2, 2019 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Labib Riachi in District Court No. 2-17-cv-00811. (KR) [Entered: 08/02/2019 03:15 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Labib Riachi v. Prometheus Group, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: PROMETHEUS GROUP
Represented By: Susan C. Cassell Esq.
Represented By: Jason D. Gregoire Esq.
Represented By: Matthew J. Borger Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FIRST CHOICE FOR CONTINENCE INC
Represented By: Michael J. Lauricella Esq.
Represented By: Michael S. Horn Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LABIB RIACHI
Represented By: Ronald T. Nagle Esq.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?