John Corbin v. Halligan, et al
JOHN L. CORBIN |
STROUP, MR. LOCK, sued in their individual and professional capacities, HALLIGAN, MR. CLARK, sued in their official capacities, MS. SMOCK, MS. GUNTHER, MS. THARP, BLAIR, MS. CHUZIE and MS. LINDER |
19-2883 |
August 21, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case, pursuant to F.R.A.P. 3(a) and LAR 3.3 and Misc. 107.1(a), for failure to pay the filing fee for the notice of appeal. Case terminated on 10/09/2019. (JK) [Entered: 10/09/2019 01:56 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Daniel B. Mullen on behalf of Appellee(s) Superintendent Michael Clark, Sandra Blair, Lisa Gunther, Michele Tharp, Jeri Smock, Brian Lock and Lisa Linder. [19-2883] (DBM) [Entered: 09/03/2019 11:50 AM] |
LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (SH) [Entered: 08/22/2019 04:32 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Meghan K. Adkins on behalf of Appellee(s) Rekha Halligan, Daniel Stroup and Cynthia Chuzie-McDowell. [19-2883] (MKA) [Entered: 08/22/2019 10:33 AM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Samuel H. Foreman on behalf of Appellee(s) Rekha Halligan, Daniel Stroup, Cynthia Chuzie-McDowell. [19-2883] (SHF) [Entered: 08/22/2019 10:31 AM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 08/21/2019 12:10 PM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. John L. Corbin in District Court No. 1-18-cv-00186. (JK) [Entered: 08/21/2019 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.