William Robinson v. National Railroad Passenger Co, et al
| BROTHERHOOD OF MAINTENANCE OF WAY EMPLOYES and NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP, DBA Amtrak |
| WILLIAM ROBINSON |
| 19-2928 |
| August 22, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| William Robinson v. National Railroad Passenger Co |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant William Robinson advising this court that no transcripts are available. [19-2928] (JLP) [Entered: 09/20/2019 12:17 PM] |
| Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (TNH) [Entered: 09/20/2019 03:49 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jason L Pearlman on behalf of Appellant(s) William Robinson. [19-2928] (JLP) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:20 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mark D. Schwartz on behalf of Appellant(s) William Robinson. [19-2928] (JLP) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:21 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant William Robinson, received. [19-2928] (JLP) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:29 PM] |
| ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant William Robinson, filed. [19-2928] (JLP) [Entered: 09/19/2019 03:25 PM] |
| ECF FILER: NON PARTICIPATION LETTER from Attorney Vladislav Kachka, Esq. for Appellee Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes Letter stating BMWE will not participate in appeal.. Certificate of Service dated 09/10/2019. Service made by ECF. [19-2928]--[Edited 09/11/2019 by CLW] SEND TO MERITS PANEL (VK) [Entered: 09/10/2019 05:00 PM] |
| FOLLOW UP LETTER to Neal Goldstein, Esq. for Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes and Vladislav Kachka, Esq. for Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form, Disclosure Statement on or before 09/23/2019. (LMR) [Entered: 09/09/2019 01:57 PM] |
| FOLLOW UP LETTER to Mark D. Schwartz, Esq. for William Robinson requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form, Information Statement, and Concise Summary on or before 09/23/2019. (LMR) [Entered: 09/09/2019 01:47 PM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee National Railroad Passenger Corp, filed. [19-2928] (NKM) [Entered: 09/05/2019 03:58 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Sheri M. Flannery on behalf of Appellee(s) National Railroad Passenger Co. d/b/a AMTRAK. [19-2928] (SMF) [Entered: 09/05/2019 03:20 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nina K. Markey on behalf of Appellee(s) National Railroad Passenger Co. d/b/a Amtrak. [19-2928] (NKM) [Entered: 08/27/2019 09:27 AM] |
| PARTY NOT PARTICIPATING: Vladislav Kachka, Esq. for Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employes will not participate in this appeal, received. (CLW) [Entered: 09/17/2019 09:58 AM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (LMR) [Entered: 08/22/2019 01:10 PM] |
| Appendix Citation Notice sent to Mark D. Schwartz, Esq., Sheri M. Flannery, Esq., Neal Goldstein, Esq., Vladislav Kachka, Esq., Lisa Leshinski, Esq., Nina K. Markey, Esq.. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 09/06/2019. (LMR) [Entered: 08/22/2019 01:17 PM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant William Robinson in District Court No. 2-18-cv-00341. (LMR) [Entered: 08/22/2019 01:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
