USAIn re: USA
| In re: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL INC and CENTER CITY HEALTHCARE LLC, Hahnemann University Hospital |
| 19-3120 |
| September 16, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (CJG) [Entered: 09/17/2019 03:41 PM]
|
| ECF FILER: Motion to Withdraw Case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) filed by Petitioner USA without costs. Certificate of Service dated 09/16/2019. Service made by ECF, Email. [19-3120] (JFB) [Entered: 09/16/2019 04:54 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Thomas Jefferson University Hospital Inc in Opposition to Emergency Motion for Temporary Administrative Stay. Certificate of Service dated 09/16/2019. [19-3120]--[Edited 09/16/2019 by CJG] (MSE) [Entered: 09/16/2019 03:32 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Response filed by Respondent Center City Healthcare LLC in Opposition to Emergency Motion for Temporary Administrative Stay and Petition for Mandamus. Certificate of Service dated 09/16/2019. [19-3120]--[Edited 09/16/2019 by CJG] (MM) [Entered: 09/16/2019 12:37 PM] |
| EMERGENCY MOTION filed by Petitioner USA for Temporary Administrative Stay (included in Petition). (CJG) [Entered: 09/16/2019 10:38 AM] |
| POSITIVE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Respondent Center City Healthcare LLC, filed. (CJG) [Entered: 09/16/2019 10:55 AM] |
| PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS DOCKETED. Notice filed by Petitioner USA. (CJG) [Entered: 09/16/2019 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
