USA v. Jesse Tullies, et al
| EUGENE WILLIAMS and JESSE TULLIES |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-3179 |
| September 27, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Mark E. Coyne, Esq. on behalf of Appellee(s) United States of America. [19-2976, 19-3179] (MEC) [Entered: 10/01/2019 11:11 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER The United States of America has filed a cross-appeal to the co-defendant appeals docketed at Nos. 19-2957 and 19-2976, which has been assigned No. 19-3179. At the appropriate time, if the United States decides to pursue its appeal, the Clerk will issue a four-step cross-appeal briefing schedule allowing as follows, filed. (See Order for full text) [19-2957, 19-2976, 19-3179] (PDB) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:38 PM] |
| Appendix Citation Notice sent to Mark E. Coyne, Esq., Joseph R. Rubino, Esq., Kathleen M. Theurer, Esq.. If unable to comply you must respond on or before 10/11/2019. (PDB) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:15 PM] |
ORDER appointing Joseph R. Rubino, Esq. as CJA counsel to continue to represent Appellee Eugene Williams. (PDB) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:13 PM]
|
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:09 PM] |
|
ORDER appointing Kathleen M. Theurer, Esq. as CJA counsel to continue to represent Appellee Jesse Tullies. (PDB) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:10 PM]
|
| CRIMINAL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by USA in District Court No. 2-18-cr-00021-001,2-18-cr-00021-002. (PDB) [Entered: 09/27/2019 03:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
