Rancourt Woodell v. Pennsylvania Department of Cor, et al
| DR. TOBIN, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. LEWIS, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. GOK, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, M. BZELTE, HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATOR, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAYETTE, BUREAU OF HEALTH CARE SERVICES, PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS EXECUTIVE OFFICE, CHRIS MYERS, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT, SUPERINTENDENT FRANKLIN TENNIS, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW, MARSH, DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW, CLARK, COUNSELOR, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAYETTE, DR. BANBRIDGE, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. SMITH, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AT GRATERFORD, MICHELLE L. HOWARD-DIGGS, PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAYETTE, DR. BLATT, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. BALK, PA. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS EXECUTIVE OFFICE, THOMAS DOHMAN, DR. NICHOLAS SCHARIFF, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS EMPLOYEE, DR. BOLK, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAYETTE, DEPUTY COFFMAN, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONAL AT ROCKVIEW, DR. JOHN SYNMONS, MEDICAL DIRECTOR, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW and DR. BIGGIO, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE |
| DR. PANDEYA, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. MOHATA, GRATERFORD MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES, GOROSIKOL, J. DEFRANGESCO, LICENSED NURSE PRACTITIONER, DR. CHRISTAN, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS EMPLOYEE, MICHAEL WENEROWICZ, DR. RUMINSKI, DR. BURKE, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT ROCKVIEW, DR. WIENER, CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS EMPLOYEE, KEMMICK, DR. VONTERSKY, GRATERFORD MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES, DR. RAYMOND MANCHAK, WEXFORD CARE COMPANY EMPLOYEE, DR. MARTINEZ, GRATERFORD MENTAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES, SAVAREEDRA, PSYCHIATRIST, STATE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAYETTE and KIMINSKY |
| RANCOURT WOODELL |
| 19-3285 |
| October 9, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (JK) [Entered: 11/04/2019 11:53 AM]
|
| MOTION filed by Appellant Rancourt Woodell to Dismiss Appeal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Response due on 11/04/2019. Certificate of Service dated 10/22/2019. Service made by US mail. (JK) [Entered: 11/04/2019 11:49 AM] |
| LEGAL DIVISION LETTER SENT advising that the case has been listed for possible dismissal due to jurisdictional defect. (NF) [Entered: 10/16/2019 02:37 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Ava M. Plakins, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Elisabeth Vonzemensky, M.D.. [19-3285] (AMP) [Entered: 10/14/2019 03:46 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Cassidy Leah Neal on behalf of Appellee(s) Dr. Martinez, Dr. Mohata, Dr. Saavedra incorrectly identified as "Savareedra, Psychiatrist," Dr. Burke. [19-3285] (CLN) [Entered: 10/11/2019 09:28 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Caitlin J. Goodrich, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) Stephen Kaminsky, PA-C, Dr. Frederick Klemick, Dr. Mohammad Golsorkhi, Barbara Ruminski, Jeanne DeFrangesco, CRNP, Dr. Haresh Pandya, and Dr. Stephen Wiener. [19-3285] (CJG) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:49 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Rancourt Woodell in District Court No. 2-18-cv-01098. (JK) [Entered: 10/10/2019 12:39 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (JK) [Entered: 10/10/2019 12:44 PM] |
ORDER (Clerk) for all parties represented by Stephen R. Kovatis, Esq. the designated filer shall be Superintendent Mike Wenerowicz, filed. (JK) [Entered: 10/10/2019 12:47 PM]
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (JK) [Entered: 11/04/2019 11:53 AM]