Frederick Nahas v. Shore Medical Center, et al
| FREDERICK NAHAS, M.D. |
| MEDICAL EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, PEYTON DEARBORN, JEFFREY GOSIN, SHORE MEDICAL CENTER, PETER JUNGBLUT, STEVEN P. NACHTIGALL, MD and LEONARD GALLER |
| 19-3433 |
| October 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Frederick Nahas v. Shore Medical Center |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| TEXT ONLY ORDER (Clerk) granting motion for extension of time filed by Appellant Frederick Nahas. Appellant's brief and appendix must be filed and served on or before February 20, 2020. (MB) [Entered: 12/19/2019 12:00 PM] |
| ECF FILER: UNOPPOSED Motion filed by Appellant Frederick Nahas for Extension of Time to file Appellant's Opening Brief until/for February 20, 2020. Certificate of Service dated 12/16/2019. Service made by ECF. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 12/16/2019 04:46 PM] |
| BRIEFING NOTICE ISSUED. Brief on behalf of Appellant Frederick Nahas due on or before 01/21/2020. Appendix due on or before 01/21/2020. (CJG) [Entered: 12/12/2019 10:21 AM] |
| Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. (TNH) [Entered: 11/13/2019 03:21 PM] |
| ECF FILER: AMENDED Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Frederick Nahas. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 11/12/2019 08:55 AM] |
| ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellant Frederick Nahas. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 11/11/2019 09:27 AM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Frederick Nahas. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 11/11/2019 09:29 AM] |
| ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellant Frederick Nahas. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 11/09/2019 05:56 PM] |
| ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellant Frederick Nahas advising this court that no transcripts are available. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 11/09/2019 10:28 AM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Jacqueline B. Bittner on behalf of Appellant(s) Frederick Nahas, M.D.. [19-3433] (JBB) [Entered: 11/09/2019 09:44 AM] |
| ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Shore Medical Center, filed. [19-3433] (EJF) [Entered: 11/07/2019 02:57 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Elizabeth K. Monahan on behalf of Appellee(s) Shore Medical Center, Dr. Steven P. Nachtigall, Dr. Jeffrey Gosin, Dr. Peyton Dearborn, Dr. Leonard Galler, Dr. Peter Jungblut, and the Medical Executive Committee.. [19-3433] (EKM) [Entered: 11/06/2019 04:33 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Edward J. Fanning, Jr. on behalf of Appellee(s) Shore Medical Center, Dr. Steven P. Nachtigall, Dr. Jeffrey Gosin, Dr. Peyton Dearborn, Dr. Leonard Galler, Dr. Peter Jungblut, and the Medical Executive Committee. [19-3433] (EJF) [Entered: 10/29/2019 05:02 PM] |
| ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Natalie S. Watson on behalf of Appellee(s) Shore Medical Center, Dr. Steven P. Nachtigall, Dr. Jeffrey Gosin, Dr. Peyton Dearborn, Dr. Leonard Galler, Dr. Peter Jungblut, and the Medical Executive Committee. [19-3433] (NSW) [Entered: 10/29/2019 05:07 PM] |
| RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 10/28/2019 11:05 AM] |
| CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Frederick Nahas in District Court No. 1-13-cv-06537. (CJG) [Entered: 10/28/2019 11:03 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
