Charlotte Pinckney, et al v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack
KYLE PINCKNEY and CHARLOTTE PINCKNEY |
PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK, DBA Pep-Boys |
19-3775 |
December 5, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
Charlotte Pinckney v. Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Martell Harris, Esq. for Charlotte Pinckney and Kyle Pinckney requesting the following document(s): Concise Summary on or before 02/11/2020. Information Statement on or before 02/11/2020. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 02/11/2020. (PDB) [Entered: 01/28/2020 05:24 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Marc D. Esterow on behalf of Appellee(s) THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK O/D/B/A PEP BOYS. [19-3775] (ME) [Entered: 12/12/2019 11:43 AM] |
ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Pep Boys Manny Moe & Jack. [19-3775] (NKM) [Entered: 12/12/2019 11:40 AM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Martell Harris, Esquire on behalf of Appellant(s) Charlotte Pinckney Kyle Pinckney. [19-3775] (MH) [Entered: 12/10/2019 12:09 PM] |
ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Nina K. Markey, Esquire on behalf of Appellee(s) THE PEP BOYS MANNY MOE & JACK O/D/B/A PEP BOYS. [19-3775] (NKM) [Entered: 12/10/2019 11:13 AM] |
RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SLC) [Entered: 12/05/2019 08:56 AM] |
CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Charlotte Pinckney and Kyle Pinckney in District Court No. 2-16-cv-05350. (SLC) [Entered: 12/05/2019 08:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.