Donna Deitrick v. Mark Costa, et al
| JANE M. ACRI, SHAMOKIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, KEVIN BALASCIK, RICHARD NICHOLS, CITY OF SHAMOKIN, JAMES BROWN, WILLIAM ZELINSKI, DENNIS MOORE, THOMAS YONCUSKI, LINDA L. LONG and ROBERT SEARLS |
| MARK A. COSTA, MARIANNE ADAMS, WILLIAM MINER and JEFF ADAMS |
| ROBERT YONCUSKI and VANESSA LONG |
| DONNA DEITRICK |
| 20-1038 |
| January 8, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Notice to Counsel. The attached document is restricted. To view document, click on the document number link in the NDA (Notice of Docket Activity). In order to access this document, you must be the attorney of record using your individual ECF login and password. [20-1028, 20-1034, 20-1038] (TNH) [Entered: 02/13/2020 12:33 PM] |
| Filing 17 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Timothy A Bowers on behalf of Appellee(s) Donna Deitrick. [20-1038] (TAB) [Entered: 02/12/2020 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 16 ECF FILER: LETTER from Stephen B. Edwards, Esq. for Appellees Mark A. Costa and William Miner, Frank J. Lavery, Jr., Esq. for Appellees City of Shamokin, Richard Nichols, Robert Searls, Shamokin Police Department and William Zelinski and Carl S. Sandel, Esq. for Appellee Mark A. Costa Non-involvement Letter relative to appeal. Certificate of Service dated 02/05/2020. Service made by ECF. [20-1038] (FJL) [Entered: 02/05/2020 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 15 ECF FILER: CIVIL INFORMATION STATEMENT on behalf of Appellants Robert Yoncuski and Vanessa Long. [20-1038] (JFO) [Entered: 02/03/2020 10:59 AM] |
| Filing 14 ECF FILER: Transcript Purchase Order Form (Part 1) filed by Appellants Robert Yoncuski and Vanessa Long advising this court that transcripts are already on file in the District Court. [20-1038] (JFO) [Entered: 02/03/2020 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 13 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Robert J. Muolo on behalf of Appellant(s) Jeff Adams and Marianne Adams. [20-1038] (RJM) [Entered: 01/30/2020 03:27 PM] |
| Filing 12 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Jane M. Acri, Esq. for Linda L. Long and Jane M. Acri, Stacey F. Acri, Esq. for Jane M. Acri, Kymberley Best, Esq. for Donna Deitrick, Timothy A. Bowers, Esq. for William Miner and Donna Deitrick, Matthew T. Boyer, Esq. for Thomas Yoncuski, Amy Lynne Coryer Miller, Esq. for City of Shamokin, Richard Nichols, William Zelinski and Robert Searls, Stephen B. Edwards, Esq. for Mark A. Costa and William Miner, Jessica S. Hosenpud, Esq. for City of Shamokin, Richard Nichols, William Zelinski and Robert Searls, Frank J. Lavery, Jr., Esq. for City of Shamokin, Richard Nichols, William Zelinski, Shamokin Police Department and Robert Searls, Robert J. Menapace, Esq. for Dennis Moore, Robert J. Muolo, Esq. for Jeff Adams and Marianne Adams, David D. Noon, Esq. for Kevin Balascik, Carl S. Sandel, Esq. for Mark A. Costa, Wayne A. Schaible, Esq. for James Brown and Michael B. Scheib, Esq. for Thomas Yoncuski requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form on or before 02/07/2020. (PDB) [Entered: 01/24/2020 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 11 FOLLOW UP LETTER to Joseph F. Orso, III, Esq. for Robert Yoncuski and Vanessa Long requesting the following document(s): Information Statement on or before 02/07/2020. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 02/07/2020. (PDB) [Entered: 01/24/2020 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 10 ECF FILER: DISCLOSURE STATEMENT on behalf of Appellee Linda L. Long and Appellant Robert Yoncuski. [20-1038] (JFO) [Entered: 01/17/2020 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 9 ECF FILER: Concise Summary of the Case filed by Appellants Vanessa Long and Robert Yoncuski. [20-1038] (JFO) [Entered: 01/17/2020 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Joseph F. Orso, III, Esquire on behalf of Appellant(s) Robert Yoncuski and Vanessa Long Yoncuski. [20-1038] (JFO) [Entered: 01/17/2020 02:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 CLERK ORDER The appeals at Nos. 20-1028, 20-1034, and 20-1038 are hereby consolidated for purposes of scheduling, joint appendix, Appellees brief, and disposition. Appellants are encouraged to consult with one another regarding the contents of their briefs as the Court disfavors repetitive briefs. Appellants may file a consolidated brief or join in or adopt portions by reference. See Fed. R. App. P. 28(i). Appellees brief must be filed and served within thirty (30) days of the date of service of the last Appellants brief. The parties are hereby directed to electronically file documents on the Courts docket as follows:Appellants: All case opening forms, motions, and briefs must be filed only in the appeal number assigned to the filers notice of appeal. If a document is being filed jointly by multiple appellants, the document must be filed only in the appeal numbers assigned to the filing appellants. Appellees: All case opening forms must be filed in all appeals in which the appellee intends to participate. All motions should be filed only in those cases for which the relief is being requested. Appellees brief must be filed in all appeals to which the appellee is responding. The consolidated joint appendix must be filed in all appeal numbers. The parties are advised that case opening forms for later filed appeals must only be filed in the new appeals and not re-filed in earlier appeals in which the forms were previously filed. [20-1028, 20-1034, 20-1038] (PDB) [Entered: 01/08/2020 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (PDB) [Entered: 01/08/2020 03:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellants Vanessa Long and Robert Yoncuski in District Court No. 4-06-cv-01556. (PDB) [Entered: 01/08/2020 03:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
