Surender Malhan v. David Katz, et al
| DAVID KATZ, in both his individual and official capacities |
| SURENDER MALHAN, for himself and as parent of E.M. and V.M. |
| 20-1112 |
| January 16, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (CJG) [Entered: 01/16/2020 11:11 AM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Mr. Surender Malhan in District Court No. 2-18-cv-16404. (CJG) [Entered: 01/16/2020 11:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Surender Malhan v. David Katz, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DAVID KATZ, in both his individual and official capacities | |
| Represented By: | Robert J. McGuire Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: SURENDER MALHAN, for himself and as parent of E.M. and V.M. | |
| Represented By: | Paul A. Clark Esq. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
