Dorothy Watson v. Social Security Administration
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| DOROTHY WATSON |
| 20-1627 |
| March 23, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 15, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER (Clerk) dismissing case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). (TMM) [Entered: 04/15/2020 10:43 AM]
|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Motion filed by Appellant Social Security Administration for Dismissal of Case pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Certificate of Service dated 04/14/2020. Service made by ECF. [20-1627] (ACL) [Entered: 04/14/2020 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 5 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Andrew C. Lynch on behalf of Appellant(s) Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security. [20-1627] (ACL) [Entered: 04/14/2020 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 FOLLOW UP LETTER to M. Jared Littman, Esq. and Michelle D. Scotese, Esq. for Social Security Administration requesting the following document(s): Appearance Form within 14 days. Information Statement on or before 04/23/2020. Transcript Purchase Order on or before 04/23/2020. (TMM) [Entered: 04/09/2020 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from David F. Chermol on behalf of Appellee(s) Dorothy Watson, Plaintiff-Appellee. [20-1627] (DFC) [Entered: 03/24/2020 06:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (TMM) [Entered: 03/23/2020 03:55 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Social Security Administration in District Court No. 2-18-cv-03056. (TMM) [Entered: 03/23/2020 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
