Jeremy Pinson v. S. Valencick, et al
| FNU HEATH, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, TRANSGENDER EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS, LEONARD ODDO, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JOSE SANTANA, T. K. COZZA-RHODES and STEVEN VALENCICK |
| JEREMY V. PINSON |
| 20-1947 |
| May 5, 2020 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ECF FILER: Response filed by Appellees BOP, T. K. Cozza-Rhodes, Heath, Leonard Oddo, Jose Santana, Transgender Executive Committee Members, USA and Steven Valencick to motion demonstrating imminent danger. Certificate of Service dated 06/19/2020. [20-1947] (TSJ) [Entered: 06/19/2020 04:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 MOTION filed by Appellant Jeremy V. Pinson demonstrating Imminent Danger. Response, if any, due on 06/22/2020. (CJG) [Entered: 06/10/2020 11:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 ECF FILER: ENTRY OF APPEARANCE from Timothy S. Judge, Assistant United States Attorney on behalf of Appellee(s) S. Valencick, L. Oddo, FNU Health, USA, Executive Cmte. Members, Teresa, Cozza-Rhodes, Jose Santana, BOP. [20-1947] (TSJ) [Entered: 05/18/2020 10:52 AM] |
| Filing 3 CLERK ORDER directing Appellant Jeremy V. Pinson to file a Motion Demonstrating Imminent Danger in addtition to all other required froms as 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(g) applies. (SB) [Entered: 05/12/2020 10:13 AM] |
| Filing 2 RECORD available on District Court CM/ECF. (SB) [Entered: 05/05/2020 03:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 CIVIL CASE DOCKETED. Notice filed by Appellant Jeremy V. Pinson in District Court No. 3-16-cv-001232. (SB) [Entered: 05/05/2020 03:36 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
